Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zbaaca wrote: ... Nasar Vyron wrote: They really should consider changing these to require BC 5 and just label them as BCs. Increase the build cost a little further and call it good. I'd still call for a nerf to speed with this regardless bu...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.20 17:06:30
|
2. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
They really should consider changing these to require BC 5 and just label them as BCs. Increase the build cost a little further and call it good. I'd still call for a nerf to speed with this regardless but at least doing this everything will begin...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.20 01:50:33
|
3. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rek Seven wrote: So the drone Proteus that currently hardly gets used is going to be made worse? Good job guys! Give it specific bonuses to medium drones only, to make it unique. The Gila would like a word with you.
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.19 02:11:41
|
4. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lord Heluene wrote: So now CCP.............you have taken away my ability to mine, and you are about to take away my ability to rat........I don't PVP unless forced to. My bad, I didn't realize this patch removed all mining barges/exhume...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.14 16:35:08
|
5. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Less effective for carriers/supers simply translates to more frigates. Which I'm fine with, slows down the rate or which sites are cleared which was the whole goal of these changes to begin with.
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.12 18:06:17
|
6. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
xOmGx wrote: LOL CCP you are greate @ working 2 days before patch and its not even changed on TEST server lel so we can test nothing at all..... wonderfull "friday midday" last minute patch "what can we screw up in eve even more?" and someo...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.11 17:02:59
|
7. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Isuro Tanaka wrote: Sure seems like a lot of "1 % of 1%" people here...hmmm. You realize you're on the EVE forums correct? So ya, this is a fraction of a fraction of the actual playerbase. The majority of which are HS players who don't give ...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.10 18:06:15
|
8. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Yodasmaster4 wrote: I disagree with the "bit too effective in PVP" just reduce the bounties. Have you looked at the damage output of a Erebus vs a Nyx? A Leviathan vs a Wyvern? Super's have higher sustained damage output than a titan as it ...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.10 00:24:57
|
9. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Buying Hell 50% off. I swear it's as if you guys don't read the same economic reports as I do. Be glad they are going this route and not just hitting bounties by like 40% which really would effect every player. They aren't even touching applicati...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.09 23:05:02
|
10. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: That kinda defeats part of the reason they are going down to 4 sets of 3 subs, which is to have better choices and remove useless combinations. Didn't realize cloak and nullification was a useless combination. Nul...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.08 03:53:16
|
11. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Vernorius Astartis wrote: guys whatever your posting.....be real and ask yourself the question.....are they gonna listen to all the suggestions your making ? i can live with the rorqual nerf.....but the respawn timer is killing the game for ...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.06 20:34:59
|
12. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
xXchochiXx wrote: isd stepping in cus players are speaking out after billions and months of skills only to be wasted and wonders why people hasty or upset sad times if your fielding 12bil plus do you not deserve a good return? Someone spend...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.05 18:28:43
|
13. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
The only part of this that hurts all players is the excavator nerfs. The spawn time is nothing more than an annoyance to smaller groups two can jump between enormous and colossal or between two systems and be fine. If you think this will have a la...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.04 17:29:35
|
14. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Altair Taurus wrote: I suppose next month's Fozzie brilliant idea would be re-spawn timers for high-end null-sec ratting anomalies: Forsaken Hub - 10 minutes, Haven - 20 minutes, Sanctum - 30 minutes. You forgot something. It will come alo...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.03 17:27:02
|
15. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Would be nice to see the passive tengue possible have less buffer when compared to the others but lower relative recharge time Ofc I'm also slightly bothered that ccp used "passive" to describe sub systems geared at b...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.03 17:23:10
|
16. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Siobhan MacLeary wrote: Nasar Vyron wrote: TLDR : should have always been Rorq = boost/utility ship, XYZ=micromanaged capital mining vessel. But since CCP felt the need to make the Rorq and actual mining vessel all this has turned into is a ...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.02 18:14:55
|
17. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
TLDR : should have always been Rorq = boost/utility ship, XYZ=micromanaged capital mining vessel. But since CCP felt the need to make the Rorq and actual mining vessel all this has turned into is a bait and switch to the players who invested in th...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.02 05:07:45
|
18. Sticky:[MAY] Blood Raider Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
If you watched fanfest you'd know Guristas is next.
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.05.09 02:41:58
|
19. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ventius Ceveros wrote: so what becomes of my drug lab , Structures like it, and all arrays? CCP Fozzie wrote: In our May release we plan to end NPC BPO seeding and the building of new Starbase structures for the following Starbase struc...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.05.07 03:00:24
|
20. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ventius Ceveros wrote: Nasar Vyron wrote: Ventius Ceveros wrote: I don't entirely understand, does this upcoming structure transition affect hisec as well, and does this mean that the towers and structures my corp has bought and launched ...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.05.07 02:31:37
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |